Using AI to Automate Literature Reviews

ASReview - Active learning for Systematic Reviews. (n.d.). ASReview. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://asreview.nl/

ATLAS.ti | The #1 Software for Qualitative Data Analysis. (n.d.). ATLAS.Ti. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://atlasti.com

Automation tools in EPPI-Reviewer. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=3772#openalex

colandr. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.colandrapp.com/signin

Connected Papers | Find and explore academic papers. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.connectedpapers.com/

Consensus: AI Search Engine for Research. (n.d.). Consensus: AI Search Engine for Research. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://consensus.app/

Consensus & GPTs for Academic Research Like Consensus (2024). (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2024, from https://www.whatplugin.ai/gpts/researchgpt

Covidence - Better systematic review management. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.covidence.org/

Discover Scholarcy Features - Try it now! (n.d.). Scholarcy | The Long-Form Article Summariser. Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://www.scholarcy.com/scholarcy-features/

DistillerSR | Systematic Review Software | Literature Review Software. (n.d.). DistillerSR. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.distillersr.com/products/distillersr-systematic-review-software

dmetar - Companion R Package for the Guide Doing Meta-Analysis in R. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://dmetar.protectlab.org/

Elicit: Find scientific research papers. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://elicit.com/?workflow=table-of-papers

EPPI-Reviewer: systematic review software. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=2914

Future Tools - Find The Exact AI Tool For Your Needs. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://www.futuretools.io/

Grantable. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://grantable.co/

How to Use ChatGPT for Academic Purposes. (n.d.). Academic Insight Lab. Retrieved January 21, 2024, from https://academicinsightlab.org/blog/how-to-use-chatgpt-for-academic-purposes

Iris.ai - Your Researcher Workspace – Leading AI for your research challenge. (n.d.). Iris.Ai - Your Researcher Workspace. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://iris.ai/

Lateral.io: Enhancing Literature Review Speed. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://eightify.app/summary/computer-science-and-technology/lateral-io-enhancing-literature-review-speed

litbaskets. (n.d.). https://litbaskets.io/

LitSonar. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://litsonar.com/

NVivo. (n.d.). Lumivero. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://lumivero.com/products/nvivo/

OpenAI API Pricing 2024: Understanding GPT-3 Pricing In-Depth. (n.d.). Retrieved January 21, 2024, from https://onix-systems.com/blog/how-much-does-it-cost-to-use-gpt-models

paperdigest (AI-Powered Research Platform). (2023, December 22). Paper Digest. https://www.paperdigest.org

Parsifal - Perform Systematic Literature Reviews. (n.d.). Parsifal. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://parsif.al/

Perplexity. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.perplexity.ai/

Rayyan - AI Powered Tool for Systematic Literature Reviews. (2021, November 8). https://www.rayyan.ai/

Research Rabbit. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://researchrabbitapp.com/

Research Solutions Announces Acquisition of scite. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.researchsolutions.com/resources/press-releases/research-solutions-announces-acquisition-of-scite

RevMan. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://training.cochrane.org/online-learning/core-software/revman

RobotReviewer. (n.d.). RobotReviewer. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.robotreviewer.net

Scanlitt. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.scanlitt.com/

Scholarcy Summarizer Review: Pricing, Features, & More. (n.d.). Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://www.notta.ai/en/blog/scholarcy-summarizer

SciPub+ | Revolutionize Your Academic Writing. (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://scipubplus.com

Scite.ai (AI for Research). (n.d.). Scite.Ai. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://scite.ai

Semantic Scholar | AI-Powered Research Tool. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.semanticscholar.org/

SESRA. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from http://sesra.net/index/about

srdb.pro. (n.d.). www.srdb.pro

SWIFT-Active Screener. (n.d.). Sciome. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.sciome.com/swift-activescreener/

Typeset (AI Chat for scientific PDFs | SciSpace). (n.d.). Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://typeset.io

Understanding the pricing of the ChatGPT API - API. (2024, January 9). OpenAI Developer Forum. https://community.openai.com/t/understanding-the-pricing-of-the-chatgpt-api/579268

WebPlotDigitizer - Extract data from plots, images, and maps. (n.d.). Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizer/

Aayush. (2023, October 29). Perplexity AI: Review, Advantages & Guide (2023). Elegant Themes Blog. https://www.elegantthemes.com/blog/business/perplexity-ai

Adams, C. E., Polzmacher, S., & Wolff, A. (2013). Systematic reviews: Work that needs to be done and not to be done. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 6(4), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12072

Aguilera Cora, E., Lopezosa, C., & Codina, L. (2024). Scopus AI Beta: functional analysis and cases. http://repositori.upf.edu/handle/10230/58658

Al-Zubidy, A., Carver, J. C., Hale, D. P., & Hassler, E. E. (2017). Vision for SLR tooling infrastructure: Prioritizing value-added requirements. Information and Software Technology, 91, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2017.06.007

Antons, D., Breidbach, C. F., & Joshi, A. M. (2021). Computational literature reviews: method, algorithms, and roadmap. Organizational Research Methods, 1094428121991230.

Antons, D., & Breidbach, C. (2017). Big data, big insights? Advancing service innovation and design with machine learning. Journal of Service Research, 21(1), 17–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517738373

Atanasova, D. (2023, May 4). Bridge or Barrier – Does generative AI contribute to more culturally inclusive higher education and research? Bridge or Barrier – Does Generative AI Contribute to More Culturally Inclusive Higher Education and Research? https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2023/05/04/bridge-or-barrier-does-generative-ai-contribute-to-more-culturally-inclusive-higher-education-and-research/

ATLAS.ti. (n.d.). ATLAS.ti AI Lab | Accelerating Innovation for Data Analysis. ATLAS.Ti. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://atlasti.com/atlas-ti-ai-lab-accelerating-innovation-for-data-analysis

Balducci, B., & Marinova, D. (2018). Unstructured data in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(4), 557–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-018-0581-x

Bax, L., Yu, L.-M., & Ikeda, N. (2007). A systematic comparison of software dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-7-40

Berente, N., Seidel, S., & Safadi, H. (2019). Research commentarydata-driven computationally intensive theory development. Information Systems Research, 30(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0774

Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a Human-In-The-Loop model. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068

Boell, S., & Wang, B. (2019). wwwlitbaskets.io, an IT artifact supporting exploratory literature searches for Information Systems research. Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Eds KK Wei.

Brocke, J., Simons, A., & Riemer, K. (2015). Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(9), 205–224.

Ch, D. (2023, November 17). ChatGPT Pricing, Explained: Plus & Tokens (2024). Guides.Ai. https://guides.ai/chatgpt-pricing/

Ciecierski-Holmes, T., Singh, R., Axt, M., Brenner, S., & Barteit, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for strengthening healthcare systems in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic scoping review. Npj Digital Medicine, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-022-00700-y

Cram, W. A., Templier, M., & Pare, G. (2020). (Re)considering the Concept of Literature Review Reproducibility. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(5), 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00630

Drapkin, A. (2023, December 11). ChatGPT Pricing: How Much Does ChatGPT Cost? Tech.Co. https://tech.co/news/how-much-does-chatgpt-cost

Education Endowment Foundation, & Durham University. (2022). EEF Evidence Database Coding Guide – Main Data Extraction (Version 3). https://d2tic4wvo1iusb.cloudfront.net/production/documents/toolkit/MDE_CodingGuide_V3_March2022-1.pdf

Elsevier. (n.d.). Launch of Scopus AI to Help Researchers Navigate the World of Research. Www.Elsevier.Com. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/launch-of-scopus-ai-to-help-researchers-navigate-the-world-of-research

Elsevier Products. (n.d.). Scopus AI: Trusted content. Powered by responsible AI. Www.Elsevier.Com. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.elsevier.com/products/scopus/scopus-ai

EPPI Centre. (2003). Core Keywording Strategy. https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/CMS/Portals/0/PDF%20reviews%20and%20summaries/EPPI_Keyword_strategy.pdf

Feynman AI. (n.d.). Feynman AI. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.feynman.ai/

Haddaway, M. W. & N. (n.d.). Developing collaborations and technology for evidence synthesis. Evidence Synthesis Hackathon. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.eshackathon.org/

Harrison, H., Griffin, S. J., Kuhn, I., & Usher-Smith, J. A. (2020). Software tools to support title and abstract screening for systematic reviews in healthcare: an evaluation. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-0897-3

Hartling, L., Ospina, M., & Liang, Y. (2009). Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 339(1), 1–6.

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Blower, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Jordan, K., Martin, K., Megha-Bongnkar, G., Murphy, M., & Walker, H. (2021). Methodology for literature reviews (Working Paper No. 10). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4557508

Haßler, B., Adam, T., Brugha, M., Damani, K., Allier-Gagneur, Z., Hennessy, S., Hollow, D., Jordan, K., Martin, K., Murphy, M., & Walker, H. (2019). Literature reviews of educational technology research in low and middle-income countries: an audit of the field (EdTech Hub Working Paper No. 2). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3523942

Haßler, B., Friese, L., & Mansour, H. (2023). Disseminating the evidence and outputs generated by your programme. EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.1001

Haßler, B., McIntyre, N., Jordan, K., Mitchell, J., Brugha, M., Martin, K., Nourie, K., & Damani, K. (2020). A scoping review of technology in education in LMICs - descriptive statistics and sample search results (EdTech Hub Working Paper No. 6). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3631588

Haßler, B., Taskeen Adam, Meaghan Brugha, Kalifa Damani, Zoe Allier-Gagneur, Sara Hennessy, David Hollow, Katy Jordan, Kevin Martin, Mary Murphy, & Hannah Walker. (2019). Methodology for literature reviews undertaken by the EdTech Hub (EdTech Hub Working Paper No. 3). EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3352100

Heatley, L. M. (n.d.). RobotAnalyst (National Centre for Text Mining — NaCTEM) [XHTML]. Retrieved January 20, 2024, from https://www.nactem.ac.uk/robotanalyst/

Higgins, J., & Green, S. (2008). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Huettemann, S. (2023). Automated Knowledge Extraction from IS Research Articles Combining Sentence Classification and Ontological Annotation. https://aisel.aisnet.org/wi2023/86/

Jalali, S., & Wohlin, C. (2012). Systematic literature studies: database searches vs. backward snowballing. Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/2372251.2372257

Johnson, C. D., Bauer, B., & Niederman, F. (2019). The Automation of Management and Business Science. Academy of Management Perspectives, 35(2), 292–309. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0159

Jonnalagadda, S. R., Goyal, P., & Huffman, M. D. (2015). Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7

Jordan, K. (2019, December 18). Reviewing the research literature in educational technology for development: Balancing rigour and inclusivity. EdTech Hub. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3581041

Kahili-Heede, M. (n.d.). JABSOM Library: Colandr for Systematic Reviews: Introducing Colandr. Retrieved January 22, 2024, from https://hslib.jabsom.hawaii.edu/colandr/home

King, R. D., Rowland, J., & Oliver, S. G. (2009). The automation of science. Science, 324(5923), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165620

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report.

Kobayashi, V. B., Mol, S. T., & Berkers, H. A. (2017). Text mining in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 733–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117722619

Kohl, C., McIntosh, E. J., Unger, S., Haddaway, N. R., Kecke, S., Schiemann, J., & Wilhelm, R. (2018). Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools. Environmental Evidence, 7(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0115-5

kssNvYB7y66y. (n.d.). Scholarcy (Online Summarizing Tool | Flashcard Generator & Summarizer). Scholarcy | The Long-Form Article Summariser. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://www.scholarcy.com/

Kunc, M., Mortenson, M. J., & Vidgen, R. (2018). A computational literature review of the field of System Dynamics from 1974 to 2017. Journal of Simulation, 12(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477778.2018.1468950

Larsen, K., Hovorka, D., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Understanding the elephant: the discourse approach to boundary identification and corpus construction for theory review articles. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 20(7), 887–928. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00556

Lemire, S., Peck, L. R., & Porowski, A. (2023). The evolution of systematic evidence reviews: Past and future developments and their implications for policy analysis. Politics & Policy, 51(3), 373–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12532

Li, J., Larsen, K., & Abbasi, A. (2020). TheoryOn: A Design Framework and System for Unlocking Behavioral Knowledge Through Ontology Learning. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1733–1772. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/15323

Lindberg, A. (2020). Developing Theory Through Integrating Human and Machine Pattern Recognition. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00593

Lumivero. (2023, October 23). Revolutionizing Text Data Analysis with AI Autocoding with NVivo. Lumivero. https://lumivero.com/resources/blog/revolutionizing-text-data-analysis-with-ai-autocoding-with-nvivo/

Marshall, I. J., Kuiper, J., & Wallace, B. C. (2015). RobotReviewer: evaluation of a system for automatically assessing bias in clinical trials. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(1), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv044

Marshall, I. (2024). ijmarshall/robotreviewer. https://github.com/ijmarshall/robotreviewer (Original work published 2016)

Marshall, I. J., & Wallace, B. C. (2019). Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 163. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9

Mortenson, M. J., & Vidgen, R. (2016). A computational literature review of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information Management, 36(6, Part B), 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.007

Nakadai, R., Nakawake, Y., & Shibasaki, S. (2023). AI language tools risk scientific diversity and innovation. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(11), 1804–1805. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01652-3

Nakagawa, S., Samarasinghe, G., Haddaway, N. R., Westgate, M. J., O’Dea, R. E., Noble, D. W., & Lagisz, M. (2019). Research weaving: visualizing the future of research synthesis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 34(3), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2018.11.007

Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational Grounded Theory: A Methodological Framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729703

O’Mara-Eves, A., Thomas, J., McNaught, J., Miwa, M., & Ananiadou, S. (2015). Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-5

OpenAlex. (n.d.). OpenAlex: The open catalog to the global research system. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://openalex.org/

Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Wong, R. (2010). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x

Reason, T., Langham, J., Gimblett, A., Malcolm, B., & Klijn, S. (2023). Breaking Through Limitations: Enhanced Systematic Literature Reviews With Large Language Models. Population, 464, 25–0. https://www.ispor.org/docs/default-source/euro2023/isporeurope23-reason--msr46poster30102023vfinal132992-pdf.pdf?sfvrsn=9cbf28b7_0

Rebolledo Font de la Vall, R., & Gonzalez Araya, F. (2023). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Language Learning Tools. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 10, 7569–7576. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02

Rowe, F., Kanita, N., & Walsh, I. (2023). The importance of theoretical positioning and the relevance of using bibliometrics for literature reviews. Journal of Decision Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2023.2217646

Russell-Rose, T., & Shokraneh, F. (2019). 2Dsearch: Facilitating reproducible and valid searching in evidence synthesis. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 24(Suppl 1), 36.

Saeidmehr, A., Steel, P., & Samavati, F. (2023). Systematic Review using a Spiral approach with Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2497596/v1

Sarin, G., Kumar, P., & Mukund, M. (2023). Text classification using deep learning techniques: a bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Benchmarking: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2022-0454

Schmiedel, T., Müller, O., & Brocke, J. (2019). Topic modeling as a strategy of inquiry in organizational research: A tutorial with an application example on organizational culture. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 941–968. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118773858

schoot, R. van de. (2023). Rensvandeschoot/software-overview-machine-learning-for-screening-text. https://github.com/Rensvandeschoot/software-overview-machine-learning-for-screening-text (Original work published 2022)

Schryen, G., Wagner, G., Benlian, A., & Paré, G. (2020). A Knowledge Development Perspective on Literature Reviews: Validation of a New Typology in the IS Field. Communications of the AIS, 46, 134–168. https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/11946

Smith, L. C. (2023). Reviews and Reviewing: Approaches to Research Synthesis. An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, asi.24851. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24851

Spillias, S., Tuohy, P., Andreotta, M., Annand-Jones, R., Boschetti, F., Cvitanovic, C., Duggan, J., Fulton, E., Karcher, D., & Paris, C. (2023). Human-AI Collaboration to Identify Literature for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3099291/v1

Storey, V. C., Lukyanenko, R., & Castellanos, A. (2023). Conceptual Modeling: Topics, Themes, and Technology Trends. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(14s), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1145/3589338

Sturm, B., & Sunyaev, A. (2019). Design Principles for Systematic Search Systems: A Holistic Synthesis of a Rigorous Multi-cycle Design Science Research Journey. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61(1), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0569-6

Swanson, D., & Smalheiser, N. (1997). An interactive system for finding complementary literatures: a stimulus to scientific discovery. Artificial Intelligence, 91(2), 183–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00008-8

Teijema, J. J., de Bruin, J., Bagheri, A., & van de Schoot, R. (2023). Large-Scale Simulation Study of Active Learning models for Systematic Reviews. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2w3rm

Templier, M., & Paré, G. (2018). Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(5), 503–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2017.1398880

Thilakaratne, M., Falkner, K., & Atapattu, T. (2019). A Systematic Review on Literature-based Discovery: General Overview, Methodology, & Statistical Analysis. ACM Computing Surveys, 52(6), 129:1-129:34. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365756

Tsafnat, G., Glasziou, P., Choong, M. K., Dunn, A., Galgani, F., & Coiera, E. (2014). Systematic review automation technologies. Systematic Reviews, 3(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-74

van de Schoot, R., de Bruin, J., Schram, R., Zahedi, P., de Boer, J., Weijdema, F., Kramer, B., Huijts, M., Hoogerwerf, M., Ferdinands, G., Harkema, A., Willemsen, J., Ma, Y., Fang, Q., Hindriks, S., Tummers, L., & Oberski, D. L. (2021). An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7

van Dinter, R., Tekinerdogan, B., & Catal, C. (2021). Automation of systematic literature reviews: A systematic literature review. Information and Software Technology, 136, 106589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106589

Wagner, G., Lukyanenko, R., & Paré, G. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the conduct of literature reviews. Journal of Information Technology, 37(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/02683962211048201

wallace, byron. (2023). bwallace/abstrackr-web. https://github.com/bwallace/abstrackr-web (Original work published 2010)

Wang, Z., Nayfeh, T., Tetzlaff, J., O’Blenis, P., & Murad, M. H. (2020). Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews. PLOS ONE, 15(1), e0227742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227742

Xiao, D. (n.d.). Research Guides: AI-Based Literature Review Tools: Home. Retrieved January 19, 2024, from https://tamu.libguides.com/c.php?g=1289555&p=9470549

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2017). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39, 0739456X1772397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456x17723971

Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.-B., Yuan, J., & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021, e8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542