Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis

RIS

Recommended format for most reference management software

BibTeX

Recommended format for BibTeX-specific software

Open in Zotero
View on zotero.org
Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
Title
Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis
Publication
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
559-572
Date
2017-11-02
Journal Abbr
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Language
en
DOI
10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189
ISSN
1364-5579, 1464-5300
Short Title
Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis <b>
URL
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189
Accessed
01/11/2023, 23:21
Library Catalogue
DOI.org (Crossref)
Citation
Moeyaert, M., Ugille, M., Natasha Beretvas, S., Ferron, J., Bunuan, R., & Van Den Noortgate, W. (2017). Methods for dealing with multiple outcomes in meta-analysis: a comparison between averaging effect sizes, robust variance estimation and multilevel meta-analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(6), 559–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1252189
Link to this record
https://docs.opendeved.net/lib/6SNZNWQQ
Relations