@article{murphy_covid-19_2020, title = {{COVID}-19 and emergency {eLearning}: {Consequences} of the securitization of higher education for post-pandemic pedagogy}, volume = {41}, issn = {1352-3260}, shorttitle = {{COVID}-19 and emergency {eLearning}}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749}, doi = {10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749}, abstract = {The COVID-19 pandemic quickly led to the closure of universities and colleges around the world, in hopes that public health officials’ advice of social distancing could help to flatten the infection curve and reduce total fatalities from the disease. Drawing on Copenhagen school securitization theory and analyzing 25 declarations of emergency eLearning at American universities, I argue that in addition to COVID-19 being framed as a general threat, face-to-face schooling was also presented as a threat through these policies. A review of securitization theory—with particular attention to the question of advocacy and the relationship of desecuritization to emancipation—grounds the investigation theoretically. I argue that securitization theory is an important tool for educators not only for observing (and understanding) the phenomenon of emergency eLearning, but also for advocating the desecuritization of schooling after the COVID-19 crisis passes.}, number = {3}, urldate = {2020-08-12}, journal = {Contemporary Security Policy}, author = {Murphy, Michael P. A.}, month = jul, year = {2020}, note = {Publisher: Routledge \_eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749 KerkoCite.ItemAlsoKnownAs: 10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749 2129771:NX7XZ24B}, keywords = {COVID-19, Securitization, \_\_C:filed:1, desecuritization, emancipation, state of exception}, pages = {492--505}, }