Is assessment good for learning or learning good for assessment? A. Both? B. Neither? C. It depends?

Newman JH. Discourses on the scope and nature of university education, addressed to the Catholics of Dublin. Dublin: James Duffy; 1852. Osler W. Examinations, examiners and examinees. Lancet. 1913;1047–59. Deng F, Gluckstein JA, Larsen DP. Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance. Perspect Med Educ. 2015;4. DOI: 10.1007/s40037-015-0220-x Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, Adendorff HJ, Herman N, Vleuten CPM van der. The mechanism of impact of summative assessment on medical students’ learning. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2010;15:695–715. Article Google Scholar Dochy F, Segers M, Gijbels D, Struyven K. Assessment engineering: breaking down barriers between teaching and learning, and assessment. In: Boud D, Falchikov N, editors. Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term. Oxford: Routledge; 2007. pp. 87–100. Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, Herman N, Adendorff H, Vleuten CPM van der. A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of summative assessment in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;17:39–53. Article Google Scholar Roediger HL, Butler AC. The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends Cogn Sci. 2011;15:20–7. Article Google Scholar Watling C. Cognition, culture, and credibility: deconstructing feedback in medical education. Perspect Med Educ. 2014;3:124–8. Article Google Scholar Saville BK, Pope D, Lovaas P, Williams J. Interteaching and the testing effect: a systematic replication. Teach Psychol. 2012;39:280–3. Article Google Scholar Lundeberg MA, Fox PW. Do laboratory findings on test expectancy generalize to classroom outcomes? Rev Educ Res. 1991;61:94–106. Article Google Scholar Watling CJ. Unfulfilled promise, untapped potential: feedback at the crossroads. Med Teacher. 2014;36(8):692–7. Article Google Scholar Sundre DL, Kitsantas A. An exploration of the psychology of the examinee: can examinee self-regulation and test-taking motivation predict consequential and non-consequential test performance? Contemp Educ Psychol. 2004;29:6–26. Article Google Scholar Cilliers FJ, Schuwirth LWT, Vleuten CPM van der. A model of the pre-assessment learning effects of assessment is operational in an undergraduate clinical context. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12. Download references Department of Health Sciences Education, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, 7925, Observatory, South Africa Francois J Cilliers You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar Correspondence to Francois J Cilliers. This article is published under an open access license. Please check the 'Copyright Information' section for details of this license and what re-use is permitted. If your intended use exceeds what is permitted by the license or if you are unable to locate the licence and re-use information, please contact the Rights and Permissions team. Cilliers, F. Is assessment good for learning or learning good for assessment? A. Both? B. Neither? C. It depends?. Perspect Med Educ 4, 280–281 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0229-1 Download citation Published: 23 October 2015 Issue Date: December 2015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0229-1

Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC PMID: 26498444