Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda

Resource type
Journal Article
Authors/contributors
Title
Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda
Abstract
An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of “implementation outcomes” distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working “taxonomy” of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes—acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability—along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
Publication
Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
65–76
Date
2011
Journal Abbr
Adm Policy Ment Health
ISSN
0894-587X
Short Title
Outcomes for implementation research
Library Catalogue
Google Scholar
Extra
Publisher: Springer
Citation
Proctor, E., Silmere, H., Raghavan, R., Hovmand, P., Aarons, G., Bunger, A., Griffey, R., & Hensley, M. (2011). Outcomes for Implementation Research: Conceptual Distinctions, Measurement Challenges, and Research Agenda. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7